The Conference on College Composition and Communication
(CCCC) kicked off today in Las Vegas with a fantastic keynote by Chris Anson. He delivered his speech as a
third-person narrative following an art history professor discovering the
political and social movements around higher education, which of course
included the cost of college and the online alternatives being explored.
He pointed out that underlying the debate is the
relationship between credit hours and accreditation, which is based on
seat-time. What do we lose when we turn to competency-based education, which
permits any number of educational experiences so long as the student can pass a
standardized competency test? These questions lead to a more fundamental one:
What is the purpose of college? Is it job training? Or is there something more
that we gain from the overall experience of a liberal arts education?
Anson argued that there are critical capacities gained
throughout the two-year or four-year college experience—curiosity, reflection,
imagination, appreciating a wide range of ideas and traditions. These
capacities are developed by engaging class discussion, co-curriculum
experiences with social clubs and study groups, collaboration, and hands-on
learning; in short, requiring students to do
something. But he also posed an important question: are our institutions
really providing students with the transformative experience that leads to
these capacities? In most cases, and especially in crowded lecture halls, the
answer is no. As Anson put it, “Students are paying for a transformative
experience and they are getting a pedagogy that hasn’t changed in years.”
So what do we do? Anson advises us to start by learning more
about how students learn and then make our own courses more engaging, more
transformative.
No comments:
Post a Comment